Thursday, February 2, 2012

There Is More To Our Story Than Madea Could Ever Tell...

I took another look at the ongoing debate between Spike Lee and Tyler Perry and I would say that I am leaning more toward the understanding of Spike Lee in this matter.  Although I applaud the antics and accomplishments of Tyler Perry, I do believe that he now has a responsibility to "do more" and use his position in the media and entertainment community to offer growth and understanding to his community.
 
I feel that Spike Lee's approach proves him to be a much better writer/producer than he is an orator.  His characters cause us to look inside ourselves and "do the right thing".  I actually  understand what he was trying to say to Tyler Perry but, I do not think he was able to verbalize himself properly.  In essence, I believe Lee was challenging Perry to produce more than comedies because very few people of color have been capable of achieving his level oof success in Hollywood.  And now, whether he wants to accept it or not, Perry has a responsibility to tell more of our story...

When Madea is on stage, it lessens the impact of a serious message that needs to be scrutinized within our culture.  Madea is a very real woman in many of our lives.  I know of aunts, cousins, mothers, and grandmothers who act just as she does, but we need to begin to transcend comedy and look seriously at the issues which plague our communities.


When Kimberly Elise was thrown out of her home by a cheating husband in "Diary of A Mad Black Woman", the platform was available to discuss infidelity, family values, spousal abuse and so much more.  Yet, we chose to laugh at the man in a dress who brandished an electric chainsaw looking for "half of what she deserves".  When Keshia Knight Pulliam was raped twice in "Madea Goes To Jail", we ignored her cries and, instead, laughed at the man in a dress who fought off unwanted sexual advances in a prison laundry room. Because of foolishness-over-principle, we are being taught to laugh at the wrong things and never learn to approach issues that could be resolved if we were more responsible.

As a responsible part of the media, all film producers should learn to escape their comfort zone and offer enlightenment instead of repeat performances of the same stereotypes that have been thrown at us.  How can we begin to demand equal representation on film if we depict ourselves as the butt of every joke?  If Mr. Perry is unwilling to create more positive role models on the same stage, then Mr. Lee was simply challenging him to work with writers who are capable of offering a well-rounded picture of our dynamic and beautiful culture.

My personal belief is that Madea (as we know her) should have been left on stage or in a situation comedy.  The movies offer a mixed message because the serious undertone is lost by the antics of the character.  Imagine the impact that these same movies would have had if someone like Jenifer Lewis (made to look slightly older) delivered the same lines.  Because she IS a real woman, her delivery of those same lines would resonate with countless family matriarchs and still not undermine the sincere tone of the script.

Again, I applaud the comedic gesture of the stage plays which fed the minds of 500 to 800 people at a time, but when the transition was made to the silver screen, I believe there is a greater responsibility to relay positive images of our culture to the thousands who are touched by these actors words and actions.

In addition, when we look at the outstanding careers of the actors who have lent their talents to the screen of some of the Tyler Perry films, we see missed opportunities for them to be recognized as contenders in Hollywood. Seriously, when an actor's dramatic interpretations are overshadowed by a comedic role, the actor, then, misses out on the acclaim that they brought to the film.  Jill Scott had a groundbreaking role in "Why Did I Get Married" and should have received an award for her ability to carry that role as well as she did.  Had it not been slated as a comedy (because major comedic characters were cast alongside her), then she may have had other roles sent her way.

Many award winning actors like Angela Bassett, Cicely Tyson, Alfre Woodard, and Taraji P. Henson's roles cause their professional resumes to be ridiculed as they continue to align themselves with secular roles that carry no weight in Hollywood.  Yes, they are getting a paycheck, but their careers (and opportunity to be seen as true actors) suffer because they are continually upstaged by the one-dimensional character known lovingly as Madea.  The next time you go to one of Tyler Perry's films, you will see that there seems to be two very different movies going on at once; a comedy centered around Madea and a drama centered around the real actors on film.  This duality confuses Hollywood and, sadly, predetermines the fate of the film.
This year, we have seen a handful of actors of color take home SAG Awards based on their performance on film; yet, we know that they are but a small portion of actors who deserve recognition.  Spike Lee hints toward the fact that, through Tyler Perry Studios, we finally have a platform where our actors can be taken seriously, but only if they are willing to play minor roles opposite one of the many characters that Tyler Perry envisions himself as being.    In short, I believe that Spike Lee is simply saying, "If you are going to cast award winning actors, please give them AWARD WINNING roles; not punchlines and stereotypical anecdotes!"

Why would George Lucas be the first to risk a fortune by telling the story of "Red Tails" instead of the most prominent black film writer/producer in America?  If Tyler Perry  is unwilling to leave his comedic background, then why can't studio space be offered to others like Denzel Washington, John Singleton or even Spike Lee in order to create the films that still need to be told?  Yes, just as Biggie said, "...more money, more problems".  But, he said this because the wealthier you become, the more responsible you be come also.  I know that there is more to my family than single mothers, abandoned children, drug problems, spousal abuse, loud talking characters and poorly dressed uncles. If you are going to tell my story, it is "ok" to include those things, but don't let them ALWAYS take center stage...

But, alas, I digress... I realize this is only ONE Man's Opinion.... What is yours?

19 comments:

  1. Sean I disagree with you 100% on your interpretation of what Spike Lee is really saying. Mr. Lee said what he said and means what he said, he believes Tyler Perry's Madea is buffoonery, a set back from Black people, not that Tyler needs to be more diversified with the choices of movies he produces because has done more than comedy.

    From both honoring his fans from his plays requests and from a financial standpoint he brought Medea to the big screen and has been very successful. Also, all Spike films are only about racism, sexism, and classism, even though he has the right to produce the films he does, the audiences aren't coming to see them as they are coming to Tyler's films.

    Mr. Lee has long had his 40 Acres and a Mule production company way before Tyler had his but Spike’s company hasn't done anything close on the level of Tyler in giving Black actors and people who work behind the scenes jobs in the movie industry. I haven't heard Black actors complaining about the roles they play in Tyler's films, and they don't have to accept them.

    What has Spike done for Black actors lately, what job opportunities has he open up for people who work behind movie productions, where's his stage studios, what monies has he given to black causes? As far as Tyler’s responsibility to his community I think he’s done and is doing far more than Spike has ever done any time since he came with “She’s Gotta Have It”!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well stated. I see and acknowledge your points; however, hold true to my own claims as well. My tongue is not as sharp as Mr. Lee's, so I will not say certain things in a certain manner. But, if we listen closely to the argument he proposes, I do believe I am echoing his sentiment in a much more respectful way.

      Not everyone with 40 Acres and a Mule will do things exactly the same way; however, we all must be stewards of our perceptions. In order to rise above stereotypes, we must learn how and when to allow them to be interpreted in public.

      Delete
  2. No Sean, not everyone “will do things exactly the same way.” Mr. Lee doesn’t have to give back to his Black community like Tyler Perry, however I do believe those who have obtained a certain level of financial success have a responsibility to reach back and help others and establish doorways of opportunities, especially trailblazers like Spike Lee!

    One thing I’ve learned about communication, the speaker will say what he wants to say but it will land differently for each listener. Mr. Lee statements about Mr. Tyler landed for you one way and you interpreted it one way. I stuck to the facts and not try to interpret what Spike meant to say because you don’t think he was able to verbalize himself properly. (Spike would kick you’re a_ _ if he heard you say that. lol) But seriously, in an interview “movie director Spike Lee said that he believes Tyler Perry’s “Meet the Browns,” “House of Payne,” and “Madea” movies are coonery and buffoonery.

    In a 2009 interview on “60 Minutes,” Tyler Perry addressed those comments by stating, “Madea is a cross between my mother and my aunt. She’s the type of grandmother that was on every corner when I was growing up. She smoked. She walked out of the house with her curlers and her muumuu and she watched everybody’s kids. She didn’t take no crap. She’s a strong figure where I come from, in my part of the African-American community. And I say that because I’m sure that there are some other parts of the African-American community that may be looking at me now going, ‘Who does he think he’s speaking of?’ But, for me, this woman was very, very visible.”

    Here’s a link to what I consider a well written Sept. 2011 article on both men style of writing:

    http://www.studentaffairs.duke.edu/mlw/news/tyler-perry-vs-spike-lee-black-identity-claims-film

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Believe it or not, I had already read that same article before writing my blog. As a writer, I do my best to research both sides of every argument before conveying my thoughts. Again, I say " Imagine the impact that these same movies would have had if someone like Jenifer Lewis (made to look slightly older) delivered the same lines. Because she IS a real woman, her delivery of those lines would resonate with countless family matriarchs and still not undermine the sincere tone of the script. Again, I applaud the comedic gesture of the stage plays which fed the minds of 500 to 800 people at a time, but when the transition was made to the silver screen, I believe there is a greater responsibility to relay positive images of our culture to the thousands who are touched by these actors words and actions."

      In saying that, I acknowledge the many Madeas in my own past, but I also point to the fact that the character is valid; the portrayal is what undermines the message. I think we agree on the fact that Tyler and Spike are two different messengers who have their own style and delivery. But, at the end of the day, the message should still remain the same.

      Delete
  3. Sean,
    You know I love everything about your writing, but I have to say a few things about Madea. #1) If Tyler Perry had left Madea on the stage, then unfortunately, he would have not had a career (or at least one this big). #2) Madea was in such high demand on stage that Tyler Perry's fans were pushing him to do movies and to include Madea-so he did what he did to please his fans (and got many new ones along the way). #3) Tyler has his mother to thank for him continuing to use Madea or not because on her death bed, she told him to never stop doing Madea.

    With that being said, where do we go from here as Madea? Consider that Madea fans, Tyler Perry [out of the dress] fans, and comedy fans in general want comedy. First of all, I think of other artists who have done some bouncing back and forth with roles that were comedic and serious. I think of Eddie Murphy. He has a habit of dressing up like a woman and that has been some of his biggest successes. Movies like Norbit and the Nutty Professor made a killing at the box office. However, the only people that had a serious issue with it were Oscar winners and some black women who thought that it was all about them, but she was a character. Martin Lawrence also wore a dress(es) on his comedy television series Martin and no one told him to stop wearing that dress or they were going to boycott him. Well, no one has told Tyler that either except of the Kim Kardashian role controversy in his new movie, which is another incident (smile).

    Unfortunately/fortunately, Tyler Perry's success gave him the best of both worlds. He could executively produce everything since he was the creator of his movies and character-Madea. With that being said, I saw very few movies that Spike Lee did that dealt with the issues that Tyler dealt with. Spike showed women as victims in most of his movies. One highlight movie was School Daze.

    Tyler apparently did the same thing, but there was always a message at the end, whether it was with song or a light humorous touch. The point being that empowerment does not not alway have to be serious. Our people have been a comedic people for years and if a person's self-esteem is high, then they can get the joke when they know that one of their own is creating it. I think Madea does need a break, but she does not have to retire. Let's not forget that The Family that Preys and For Colored Girls were awesome movies and they barely got the attention that they deserved and they did not include Madea. I think people need to give Tyler a chance to develop his producing skills to deal with dramas and he will do fine.

    P.S. I no longer appreciate Spike's message. Make us a movie in today's time Spike, and then make a comment. He is like a rapper to me beefing with another person, which is only making him look bad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am a writer myself. And I play a comic relief character in my plays. I play a drunk alcoholic, sarcastic old 61 year old man. We do live in a world with a lot of hurt, pain and misery. And sometimes we do need to laugh. I do agree with we shouldn't have too much comedy when you are doing a melodrama/gospel play. We want people to learn the message, but Tyler does deliver that message in all his plays. He can be funny but serious just as well. It's sad that people like Spike Lee has to hate on another black writer. It's bad enough that others hate and have prejudice against us. Why should we do it to each other? This is one of the reasons why BLACK people can get ahead, because we are like crabs pulling each other down in the pot of boiling water. Instead of helping each other, we too busy hindering each other.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Sean. I believe Mr. Tyler has a vision and a roadmap and he has definitely reached back and helped his community so he hasn't forgotten where he's from. Where has Mr. Lee been when the NAACP needed help or a grandmother needed a home or Black children couldn’t go to a white pool? Black plays weren't reaching the portion of the Black community that Tyler has brought in so he filled a void. Who’s seeing Spikes films, hardly anybody?

    I believe if you sat down with Mr. Tyler for an interview and had an intelligent conversation with him you might not be standing on your position and see another side of him, a man who loves his people instead of the opinions of haters!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am so glad that so many people have read this and stated their opinions so well, but many of you are missing the point that I made. I enjoy both Tyler Perry and Spike Lee. I am not favoring one over the other as I believe that they each have a place in our literary world, but I am stating that I acknowledge Spike's frustration with what he DOES NOT SEE in Tyler's films.

    I am far from being a crab in a bucket. I am exciting conversations and challenging many of you to demand more from those who are in a position to do so. Go back and read my arguments. I said, "if he is unable or unwilling, then maybe he should allow others to create". Tyler can perform Madea until he is old and grey, but I do not believe that will remedy any situation that he brings to film. He is a comedic actor and has not (despite his efforts) broken that mold. You simply cannot cast yourself opposite a dramatic, tenured actor and then deem yourself to be on their caliber or even worthy of carrying a major role. I, too, applaud Mr. Perry. I would love to interview him. But my questions would be focused more on what the overall effect of a film should be; not how many laughs were garnered.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well I didnt take the time to read all the comments but i did read what you wrote and the articles mentioned as well and my opinion on it all is that this will always be a problem instead of looking at it in that way and allowing it to remain a issue I believe that Mr.Lee and Mr. Perry should take the time out to sit together and come up with an epic film. It is only right instead of it becoming a battle of who does what and depicts what we need to come together and ensure that black hollywood gets the recognition it deserves and so that black directors and writers wont have to struggle as hard to be taken seriously we can do it we just have to stop finding something that divides us we are all accountable and we all need to show " hollywood" that this is one area we are not divided in. thats all im saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simone,

      You are profound! I agree wholeheartedly. Maybe I used too many words to say the very same thing... Keep reading. I have enjoyed your commentary.

      Delete
  8. As an author/writer I disagree with Simone and definitely Sean on several points but I do agree we as a community have to stop bringing one another down when other of us have successes. Having said that let me say this,, Mr. Lee was the bully picking on Mr. Perry because he didn’t like the films Tyler was making calling Tyler Perry’s successes “Meet the Browns,” “House of Payne,” and “Madea” movies “coonery and buffoonery”. In responding, defending his work Mr. Perry never put down Mr. Lee’s contribution which doesn’t mean he liked everything Spike has put out there. He respected Mr. Lee’s right to make the type of movies he wanted to make.

    There’s no a battle as it is Tyler stating that he was “so sick of hearing about damn Spike Lee," saying “I am sick of him talking about me.". As Mr. Perry further says "I am sick of him saying, 'this is a coon, this is a buffoon,' "I am sick of him talking about black people going to see movies. This is what he said: 'you vote by what you see,' as if black people don't know what they want to see." As I’ve said earlier, Tyler Perry filled a void, regular people wanting to see plays they could readily identify with, not black plays with just upscale characters played by glamorous stars like Vivica A. Fox, Brian McKnight, Boris Kodjoe and Richard Roundtree.HATEVER

    I was never a fan of Tyler Perry’s plays but not because of his plays as it was of all those “black” plays with the cheatin’ husband or wife. I never saw his Madea character (except for selected clips on Youtube) until I saw “Medea Goes To Jail” movie and thought his character was as funny as the female characters Martin Lawrence, Academy Award Winner Jamie Fox and the infamous Flip Wilson portrayed. Why didn’t Mr. Lee go after Martin and Jamie? Maybe it’s professional jealousy with Mr. Perry financial success when Spike could barely get financing or distribution for his last movie, “Miracle at St. Anna” (He talked about it on Oprah when he was promoting it) which did not do well by the critic’s reviews or box office receipts.

    As far as the two directors’ collaborating, that is just a professional no no for obvious reasons not unique to just them but to most creative people, you just cannot work together because of egos. One thing that Sean will find when he either discusses his book with people he doesn’t know or when it comes out, people will be telling him what he needs to write next or how you should have written it even though you’re the writer. Same thing with Sean and Spike, you’re entitled to your opinion but Tyler has the right to produce, write and direct the films he wants to give his audience and not be dictated by those who aren’t investing in his films. It also will hold true for Sean, those who want him to write a book with a topic they want him to explore need to invest the money or in the words of Tyler Perry “Shut the hell up”!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Grandprize (and all others who read this with one eye open),

      I struggled with responding to your post because I am trying to see where we disagree. As a writer, I do not expect others to always see my vision and I am sure Tyler Perry struggles with the same issues. Rather than "shut the hell up" on my own site; however, I offer a volley of intellect...

      Please realize that I am, in no way, taking away from the accomplishments or interpretations of Tyler Perry. If you take the time to read my words, you will see that your sentiment echoes mine, but I am still holding strong to the belief that he could open his studios to create roles that he is either unwilling or unable to create. Every artist / writer / producer can only interpret things from their vantage point and, therefore, should be willing to accept criticisms and grow from them. If he cannot grow, then I challenge him to make way for young writers who can interpret the vision without relying on a comedic character to deliver a serious role.

      I applaud "For Colored Girls" as being a step away from what he was used to doing, but the stark difference there is 1) it was a remake and he had limited artistic freedom, and 2) he was not in the film at all which made it much better than any diluted message delivered by a comedic character. I know people who have worked with both Tyler Perry and Spike Lee and (of the two) Spike Lee is much more receptive to criticism and has learned to integrate others into his thought process. But, since this is only third-party here-say, I will move forward.

      The purpose of this dialogue was not to attack the way in which Spike Lee verbalized himself, but it was intended to shed light on the fact that there is room for more than Madea on the center stage of black American cinema. We must begin to demand more from those who can provide more. If Tyler Perry is the highest paid in his field, then it is common to look to him for greater responsibility in his depictions of our race.

      Amos and Andy were necessary parts of our theatrical past, but now that we own studios, employ directors, and produce our own films, I only ask that we begin to repair the damage that stereotypes have done to our culture instead of continually applaud them. When our male role models belittle themselves by wearing a dress (Martin Lawrence, Jamie Foxx, Ving Rhames, Shawn and Marlon Wayans, Chris Rock, etc.), then is is harder for them to ever be seen as serious actors. Of those named, only one person has successfully transitioned into dramatic roles. It is a new era and if we are to be seen seriously, I challenge our leaders in the industry to write roles worthy of the acting caliber that exists within our culture.

      I would love to sit and interview Tyler Perry. As a matter of fact, it is something I aspire to do. I have a great respect for him and would like to create a dialogue that would enlighten me as to why his mind operates as it does. An interview would only bring to light those opportunities which still exist in black cinema. George Lucas "experimented" with Red Tails and took a daring risk on what he thought we wanted to see. It is sad that we have been deprived our history and (when it is presented), we choose to go see a comedy instead.

      Tyler Perry is a comedian. Spike Lee is comedic. Obviously, their interpretations will differ. But is there room for compromise? Tyler would not exist had it not been for the attempts to break down barriers made by Spike Lee, John Singleton and others before him. Rather than bicker, why not create a space where their collaborations could prevail? As the title of this blog suggest so clearly, I simply believe that there is more to MY STORY than Madea could ever tell. If Madea is all that you can ascertain from your experiences, then feel free to continue to patronize those films. I, on the other hand, thirst for much., much more...

      Delete
  9. I disagree I have seen all of Tyler Perry's movies as well as all of Spike Lees Movies. I must say I get the spiritual message, the comedy and the sometimey seriousness of Tyler Perry Movies easier than I got the messages from Spike Lee Movies. We have to understand Spike's movies were made in a different time....when it was black this and black that. Tylers movies are made in a time when we need to laugh to keep from crying, people as a whole are more spiritual and we do not need that MESSAGE thrown at us. I think Tyler Perry Movies are great family movies. Spike can do his thing and Tyler can do his. Put them up against each other same movie made their way and Tyler would kill Spike. I'm just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Madea is not in all Tyler Perry productions....Do not stereotype him or degrade him...The Madea character is REAL, whether you like her ways or not...That is why Tyler is profitable....He is meeting a need!!!Dont hate on his "Good Deeds"...

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's very interesting how we hold people to a particular standard then refuse to live up to the very things we accuse others(usually the more prominent of us) of not doing. I have read the articles, the comments and listened to both sides of the argument. It boils down to this MORE DIVISION! Adults, when comparing apples to oranges we always get it wrong.

    These to men are two very different story tellers there is no competition only a plea of more responsible imagery. We(Black people) complain all the time about how we are depicted in entertainment, and how this impacts the way we are treated and approached by our peers in other communities. The issue is we argue that point only when it's something that we dislike for one reason or the other. In other words we tend to be very hypocritical in our judgments. Spike Lee has created epic movies with epic cast, he continues to tell thought provoking stories that are not just limited to the black experience. His perspective is extremely broad, and he is to be commended for is contribution to cinema, the arts and to the actors whose careers have been propelled due to the success of 40 Acres and A Mule. Tyler Perry has done extremely well with his projects and his work is more central to a comedic approach to very heavy issues. This has struck a chord with many people primarily Blacks because we can relate to the characters and it makes us laugh, cry and feel. With this Mr. Perry has made a fortune and is able to position himself in a way that makes him very influential. They both deliver messages.

    These are a few questions I have since Spike Lee has paved a way for people like Tyler Perry. He has more wisdom because he has been around longer,he is seasoned if you will. He is like a big brother or uncle giving us something to think about because he has seen where this can go. Why are we so critical of his statements? Why are we so quick to assume this is coming from a place of hate? Spike continually gives black people everything he has that an artist can give to a group of people. "Malcolm X" Damn, what a brotha gotta do! And for the record Spike is still making movies, great ones.

    But here's the big question; Why will projects like "Madea Goes to Jail"(comedy) get major funding easily and movies like "Red Tails" or "Miracle at St. Anna" have to struggle to get funding and still go through distribution issues in the U.S.? This is where our fight should be not with each other. Please Stop The Madness!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Perception depends greatly on one's mindset at any given point along the journey. I love Spike Lee and I own a lot of his films. At the same time, as much as I love Tyler Perry, I own a few of his "funnies" but a lot of the others. Why? Because for me, those "funnies" are for entertainment purposes and NOT worth the investment in my personal library. For someone else, the opposite may be true. Spike Lee can be a little unclear in the messages he tries to convey, which is also the very reason that Tyler Perry's existence is necessary. In my opinion, Spike's messages were of social consciousness where Tyler seeks to heal the soul. Both agendas are of great necessity in our communities which are sharply divided on too many issues. Tyler can reach the people that Spike cannot. I don't condone the manner in which Spike opted to PUBLICLY demonstrate his disapproval of Tyler's work as both men are viewing the art through a healing lens. There is strength in numbers and I personally would love to see them work TOGETHER on a project that is well-rounded (socially conscious, spiritual, mildly humorous, yet deep) to permanently gel the frayed mindset of our people as a whole. There would be no Tyler without pioneers like Spike, Robert Townsend, and countless others. All continue to experience the same sacrifices and struggles to pursue the passion as do the actors and actresses they employ. And please...let us be mindful about judgement. Every closed eye isn't sleep. Just because one DOESN'T see or hear about Spike's community contributions doesn't mean they're non-existent. And everything pumped into REGULATED media streams is NOT always for the benefit of the "community". Food for thought...and one WOMAN's opinion

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow DAP...we were typing AND thinking at the same time...lol

    ReplyDelete
  14. Asking what Spike Lee has done lately is as relevant as asking what any historian of modern day has contributed to recent developments. Spike opened the doors that Perry now stands in the threshold of. He is important because he was a pioneer with a vision and, without him, there may not have been a Tyler Perry Studio. Years from now, another film maker will replace Perry and the next generation will ask who was he, so we must never downplay the contributions of our predecessors because we could learn more by weening from their experiences as opposed to charging forward with our own understanding.

    Again, I do not discredit Perry as I am still very proud of his accomplishments. I just believe that he should listen carefully to the film makers that have proceeded him and decipher the positive message that may lie beneath the words that only sound critical. Both men have accomplished a great deal and both are to be applauded. But, as I recall a great rapper saying, "more money, more problems" because as your audience grows, so does your social responsibility.

    I applaud both men for their efforts although I may not particularly patronize either one over the other; however, Spike is still very influential and vigilant in producing films that capitalize on bringing attention where he feels his support and celebrity are needed. He was one of only a few celebrity screenwriters who chose to explore the current plight of misplaced New Orleans residents who have yet to receive support after losing everything in the floods. He also has a recent film, Red Hook, is due to be released in August. http://youtu.be/nHo4MJ_uPv8

    I am not suggesting that Perry has to listen to Lee solely because he was a predecessor, but since it was a public dispute, I offered my commentary. I do; however, believe that Perry took heed to the underlying message that Lee delivered when he wrote "Good Deeds" and shed light on his serious side. Perry has great potential and I believe that Lee simply suggested that he carry us further forward rather than choosing to set us back...

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree it is terrible how we are depicted in “most” movies and then our “own” culture downgrades us as well. I believe that it is not a good example for our youth especially since we are trying to build up our community. We as a culture have to learn to have pride in ourselves and some of these movies brings us down to the gutter. I wish there were more movies out the show BEST side of black culture but unfortunately it is not and its sad. All I can do is Hope for the best and pray that the next generation of black directors and actors will do more movies that show the good side of the tracks and not always the bad!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for joining the conversation. We look forward to sharing our perspectives on an array of topics ranging from religion, relationships, and social candor to political positioning.

Let's engage and challenge our current interpretations of daily topics. In doing so, we may just broaden our own horizons and learn something new.

Remember, this is a safe, no judgement zone. No one is right. No one is wrong. Instead, we are all just enjoying a peek into a different way of thinking. This may be ONE Man's Opinion, but we revel in the open exchange of dialogue as we open our minds to all others.